Three-level filter for determining whether an asset needs battery-free sensing — Level 1 (sealed, inaccessible, battery-free is the only option), Level 2 (accessible but maintenance is costly, battery-free eliminates a pain point), Level 3 (accessible with standard maintenance, consider alternatives) — with three qualifying questions.

A practical three-question filter to determine whether your monitoring application genuinely needs battery-free sensing, or whether battery-powered or wired alternatives might be simpler and cheaper. Honest guidance on when to call us — and when not to.

Four SenseBLE evaluation boards — EVAL-SBLE-AT (ambient temperature), EVAL-SBLE-RHAT (humidity and temperature), EVAL-SBLE-ACC (3-axis accelerometer), and EVAL-SBLE-MGF (magnetometer) — each at 50 euros, powered by UHF RF harvesting, communicating via BLE advertising bursts receivable by any BLE device.

Complete guide to the SenseBLE evaluation boards. Four battery-free sensor tags that communicate via BLE advertising bursts — same sensors as SenseID, lower infrastructure cost. All at 50 € and readable by any BLE device.

Side-by-side comparison showing EPC C1G2 path (single RFID reader with same-band TX and RX, higher cost) versus BLE burst path (separate RF transmitter and BLE gateway in different bands, lower combined cost), with a section showing what stays the same: sensor, accuracy, range, and data.

Why UHF RFID readers cost more than RF transmitters plus BLE gateways, when each option makes economic sense, and how to think about total cost of ownership for battery-free sensor deployments.